Tyrrell vs Perry and Gozonews in between

Now that the elections (EP and local) are over in this holy island, the airstip campaign starts over again.

The Gozo Tourism Association and the Gozo Business Chamber keep pushing Mr. Roy Perry to keep lobbying on their behalf. These few local businessmen find it very convenient to use a 'blind' foreigner to push forward their own hidden agenda.

Now The Times of Malta also did its share. Interesting are the on-line comments there!

One can find a good account on the Maltastar.com on the conflicting views of Tyrrell and Perry and how the GozoNews.com was being used as a medium in between.

Proposed airstrip dotted with archaeological remains!

Proposed site for Gozo airstrip, dotted with archaeological remains, is drowning in waste
by FRANCESCA VELLA

Ta’ Lambert, the main site earmarked for the proposed airstrip in Gozo, is dotted with important archaeological remains, but it is truly going to the dogs, as waste is dumped there illegally on a daily basis, this newspaper has learnt.

Despite enforcement notices issued by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority regarding the illegal dumping of waste at the site, it has turned into a horrible, foul-smelling dump.

Alternattiva Demokratika recently held a press conference at Ta’ Lambert on the matter, saying that “either the authorities are turning a blind eye to certain individuals, or, that the government, contrary to its much-vaunted eco-Gozo campaign, is hell-bent on irreparably harming the long term sustainability of Gozo as a quality tourist destination”.

AD spokesman for Gozo Victor Galea told The Malta Independent on Sunday yesterday that he went to have a look at Ta’ Lambert on Friday, and said the situation had worsened since the party held the press conference at the beginning of last month. Animal carcasses are also being dumped there now, he added.

The site is mostly mentioned because of its close proximity to the non-operational heliport, and the fact that it is the main site earmarked for the proposed airstrip.

Little importance is given to the site’s archaeological remains, including cart ruts, which the Gozo Ministry itself mentions on its website and gives directions on how to get there. How could the ministry promote a site that has been turned into a dump? READ HERE

Even the Environmental Impact Assessment report on the Tal-Kus Waste Transfer Facility, close to Ta’ Lambert, makes reference to the “site in vicinity of area is of archaeological value”.

The archaeological and cultural heritage features identified within 500 metres of the site include a number of vernacular structures such as rubble walls and agricultural stores.

The site is also home to St Cecilia’s Tower and St Cecilia’s Chapel – the only chapel in Gozo that dates back to medieval times – as well as Ghar ix-Xih, which is important for the rock-cut features carved on the cave’s walls and the surrounding garigue.

One of the fields at Ta’ Lambert also has a stone alignment, consisting of a row of six large stones that may have formed part of a much larger megalithic structure, possibly buried underground.

Joe Muscat, from the Gozo Tourism Association told this newspaper that whenever presentations on the heliport are made to the authorities, reference is always made to the fact that the area has been turned into a dumping site.

Indeed, illegal dumping has been going on for years; the first enforcement notice was issued in 1996, a year before Roy Perry proposed the idea of building an extension to the non-operational helipad.

Asked what the GTA was doing to stop the illegal dumping at Ta’ Lambert, Mr Muscat said the association always puts pressure on the authorities by insisting that the island’s “product has to be taken care of”.

But he spent more time talking about the proposed airstrip, which he said is necessary as a means of providing alternative access to Gozo. He added that it does not necessarily have to be built at Ta’ Lambert.

“Access means success. We have a very good link to Malta by sea, but that does not mean we should not have an alternative in the form of a financially viable air link using a fixed wing aircraft. We’re not talking about an airport; that would not make sense considering the island’s infrastructure.

“Gozo is not a crib; it is not a place where people simply move to when they reach retirement age. We need to strike a balance between the rural character of the place and development as a means of sustaining the tourism industry.”

He acknowledged the need for a study on the impact that the airstrip would have on the environment, agriculture, and archaeological remains.

Time is pressing however, he said, insisting on the need for a solution to have an airstrip in Gozo.

But AD’s Victor Galea is not convinced, particularly because so many people have been so secretive about the airstrip issue.

“The GTA and the GBC (Gozo Business Chamber) are all for an airstrip in Gozo (specifically on this archaeological site). At the same time, they have been extremely silent about the dumping of waste at Ta’ Lambert. What do we really want for Gozo?”


Xewkija Temple in Malta : In collaboration with British Archaeological Jobs Resource Contents: Natural stones or ancient megalithic remains in Coate? Reprint of Xewkija temple report A brief history of Stonehenge theories Underwater excavations of a Turkish prehistoric settlement 4,000-year-old 'Abraham's Gate' reopened to public Rare Iron Age bowls unearthed in Wales Walkers are dismantling ancient Yorkshire cairnsa New technology for dating ancient rock paintings 6,000-year old cave paintings found in Peru Bronze Age burial site damaged by Scottish Police Speaker: David Connolly (BAJR) Â Listen to the weekly Archaeo News. Listen to Podcast HERE

Malta IS a concrete jungle...let's Gozo NOW!

Monday, 26th January 2009

Gozo airstrip still seems pie in the sky

Christian Peregin

Those who for years have been making proposals to have a reliable air link to Gozo fear nothing concrete will ever be done, even though the government said recently it was open to "economically feasible" suggestions.

The island has been without a land-based air connection since the helicopter service was stopped in 2005. It is only served by a seaplane from Grand Harbour, a service which does not run in winter.

Some people have been pushing for the infrastructure at the inactive Gozo helipad, in Xewkija, to be put back to use by building a runway as an extension.

"No one is taking it seriously," Roy Perry, who submitted the proposal in 1997, said in a disappointed voice. He added that he did not know of anyone who objected to the project, as long as it did not have adverse environmental consequences, something he said his plans guarantee.

He is just one of the enthusiasts who have come up with creative solutions to the problem of having no direct air link between Luqa airport and Gozo in the absence of the old helicopter connection.

When the service was cancelled, a seaplane operation was set up from the Grand Harbour. But this cannot function when it is dark or the sea is rough and, consequently, stops flying during the winter months. Also, since it is based at the Grand Harbour, it does not enable quick transfers from the airport to Gozo.

Mr Perry argued that in the light of the difficult year ahead for tourism, this was one project that should be concluded as soon as possible in order to create an efficient, reliable and cost-effective service. He estimates the flight would cost about €75 return and it would take 15 minutes to get from Malta to Gozo.

The secretary of the Gozo Tourism Association, Joe Muscat, has in the past argued that the seaplane is no substitute for a proper air link between the airport and Gozo. A runway was needed to attract tourism, he insisted. The operation of a fixed-wing aircraft would require a small airstrip but, in view of environmental concerns, the association has proposed that the secondary road behind the heliport, linking Għajnsielem to Xewkija, could be developed for this purpose.

The road would only be closed to traffic while aircraft were operating.

Pilot and aviation investor Victor Mercieca has come up with yet another proposal: for the runway to be built on reclaimed land at the Mġarr Harbour. However, this would be more costly and time-consuming because it would involve the building of an artificial extension to the breakwater.

The different proposals have been discussed by the authorities a number of times and, although no final decisions have been taken, all parties involved seem to agree that an air link is desirable.

The Gozo Business Chamber is all in favour of the airstrip but its president, Joe Grech, said he had received no updates about the proposals submitted.

When contacted, the Gozo Ministry said it too wanted a decision to be taken and that it was in favour of a "sustainable and reliable air service" but did not comment about the proposals available.

Subject
Gozo airstrip still seems pie in the sky

Name (your name and surname)

To (email address of the recipient)

Message (optional)

Comment about "Gozo airstrip still seems pie in the sky"

Full Name (your name)

Email (your email address)

Home town

Phone

Comments

M.Bezzina (on 27/1/09)

@H Dempster

Malta is a concrete jungle!!Hope you did not choose or you dont choose Malta to live when you retire!!

Victor G.Mercieca (on 26/1/09)

@ Mr.Dempster,Mr.Shields,& Mr.Green,
It appears from your comments that you are all expats retired in Gozo? & have no need to commute almost daily to work like most people do from both sides & who have to wake up in the early hours to meet the current slow surface schedule! Most level headed people realize that you are the usual armchairs critics who basically enjoy installing negative perceptions against a vital GA Airstrip(Incidently 50% of the infrastructure is in place) much needed for sustainable & consistant commerce,tourism paralleling with Malta & will also put Gozo as a direct niche GA destination from now Schengen Europe....It is true that GA in Malta is flourishing, thanks to many local dediciated professional indivisuals, aero clubs, pilots associations, flight schools with their great personal efforts & expense will certainly operate in & out of Gozo, at the great benefit of the general public as an alternative choice to commute in less time consuming, in a safe & cost effective manner!

John Azzopardi (on 26/1/09)

Gozo needs a some form of air service. period. Gozo is a forward looking island, and by denying an air service to it's inhabitant and tax paying citizens is not right. When we had the helipter service, tourist loved it. I know that there are several foreigners living in Gozo are against an air service. But, times change and the time has come for Gozo to have back some form of an air service. It's a need that cannot be denied.

James A. Tyrrell (on 26/1/09)

The same old argument which raises it’s ugly head every few months. Gozo does not need an airstrip. Roy Perry says that he knows of no one who is against it. Is he living under a stone somewhere? No one wants it period!

Also I wish people would stop using tourists like myself as an excuse for building an airstrip. Tourists like myself enjoy the peace and quiet on Gozo and the last thing we want more noise pollution and an ugly concrete scar on the face of the island.

The only people who will benefit from an airstrip on Gozo are the developers and the rich set who want to be able to fly their little planes in and out of Gozo whenever they like.

Hands off Gozo. You people have done enough harm to the island. If you want an airlink then bring back the helicopter link.

M. Cachia (on 26/1/09)

While I strongly encourage AOPA's efforts to continue pushing the authorities to make a decision regarding this matter, I must point out that light aircraft, with or without the airstrip will still remain "humming" over Gozo. Private pilot training is usually performed in the Gozo area since this is the location where commercial traffic is less likely to interfere with the training aircraft. I must also point out that these aircraft are very silent aircraft and I do not see any reason why the airstrip and hence the aircraft making use of it, would pose any threats to the tourism sector.

Rod Abela (on 26/1/09)

As secretary Aero Club Malta, I have to clarify that our club had submitted proposals to initially extend the existing 'runway' of 172m to 350m on the western side of the existing heliport. This would allow sport light aircraft to operate and to test whether the environmental concerns (noise, etc) are justified or not. On a personal basis I had supported on various occasions promoters like Franco J. Scicluna and Victor Mercieca long before Mr Perry submitted his proposals. I have a strange feeling that the anti-airstrip lobby is formed by expats living on Gozo... In any case the point is that unless Gozo is given a small 800mt runway strip it will continue to lose on the lucrative revenues generated by light aviation industry and will continue to remain isolated. This is in stark contrast with what is happening in nearby Sicily with the town of Ragusa redeveloping the former NATO airbase at Comiso and Agrigento planning to have its own airstrip. Sleep on Gozo, sleep on!

I Gatt (on 26/1/09)

Gozo may enjoy peace and tranquility and this will certainly not be jeopardised by aircraft flying in and out. It is not an international airport that we seek and aircraft movements would indeed be limited. Gozo and its nationals suffer from double insularity and with todays' dependency on logistics makes this simply unacceptable. The potential for a landing strip in Gozo is indeed high. As an organisation AOPA (Malta) has been a strong advocate in favour of such a strip. It would increase accessibility, attract a different breed of tourists, increase safety and provide rapid transit in the event of an emergency.
As can be imagined an environmental Impact assessment would indeed be carried out, however, according to feasibility studies carried out by AOPA, the impact would be minimal as we had designed the strip to replace the existing dirt road just South of the existing Heli-pad. Our presentation was well received by th GTA and representatives from Gozo's business community and we hope to have the opportunity to present this to the honorable minister for Gozo in due course. AOPA (Malta) also supports initiatives being taken by Messrs. V. Mercieca and R. Perry.
Ivan X. Gatt
President (AOPA) Malta

Peter Green (on 26/1/09)

Tourists and Maltese that come to Gozo for a holiday want total piece and quiteness. Having planes humming above the Gozo tranquil countryside is NOT good for Gozo tourism!

I honestly believe that Gozo Tourism Association lost the plot. One wonders why Gozo Ministry supports GTA with resources when GTA has lost its touch with true tourism in Gozo.

Kurt Shields (on 26/1/09)

I totally agree with Mr. Dempster. Gozo shouldn't be developed any more. We shouldn't make an airstrip.

If the road linking Ghajnsielem to Xewkija can be temporarily closed for operating aircraft, I think that will be a good solution.

However any form of development on countryside is certainly terrible and certainly isn't the right way to help tourism.

M. Cachia (on 26/1/09)

A few metres of runway strip are, in my opinion, negligible to what this airstrip might offer in the long-term. The general aviation sector in Malta has been very active in the last few years, and is becoming increasingly popular among Maltese people. The Gozo airstrip will be a means for local pilots to travel to Gozo with their private planes (hired or their own), and will also attract general aviation pilots from nearby countries. Moreover, there are companies locally which are equipped with light aircraft already and would be probably available for this business. Why use a foreign company when there are already a number of companies locally which might be interested in conducting the flights between the islands? What is the fuss all about? Environment? For a few metres of asphalt?

H Dempster (on 26/1/09)

HANDS OFF BEAUTIFUL GOZO. Dont destory it and leave it as it is , in its natural beauty.

To attract tourists one does not have to build runways. there are many islads , worldwide which are reached by ferries.

So just leave it alone, Look at Malta, it hase become a contrete jungle.

Who is pressing for the Gozo airstrip?

From The Times:

General Aviation operators are calling on the government to declare its position on proposals for the building of an airstrip for small piston engined aircraft in Gozo. A retired Royal Air Force officer and private consultant on general aviation has also, on his initiative, been giving presentations to the Gozo Business Chamber and other bodies on the benefits of Gozo having an airstrip, and how this could be brought about.

Roy Perry said the recent explosion in fuel prices should have further hammered home the fact that any air link with Gozo has to use small fixed wing aircraft, rather than helicopters, which were far more expensive to run. They also make more noise. He first formulated a plan to supplement the helicopter service in 1997 so that Gozo could have direct access to Sicily and Tunisia in addition to a fast and efficient link to Malta International Airport.

“I have studied the idea for many years and believe that the use of small commuter aircraft with no more than 19 passengers and operating at the same frequency as the 1996 helicopters will benefit all who visit and live in Gozo,” he told timesofmalta.com.

Victor Mercieca, a general aviation pilot, said that what was being proposed was the building of a 1,000 metre runway facing North West near the existing helipad and parallel to the road leading to the new sewage treatment plant (picture). The helipad would become an apron and the existing terminal building would be retained.

He did not feel the helipad itself should be extended, for various reasons including the proximity of buildings in Ghajnsielem

“It is a pity that no government has ever taken general aviation seriously. It is a huge industry in Europe and one which Malta and Gozo can benefit from. Just look at what Lampedusa have done. This can become a new gateway for Gozo. There are obvious tourism benefits. And a scheduled air service between Malta and Gozo will cost a third of the operating costs of a helicopter and provide a more flexibility, reliable and efficient service.”

Mr Mercieca said he knew of people who had shown an interest in investing in such an airstrip if a long lease agreement could be reached with the government, possibly a public-private partnership.

Roberto Benetti, another pilot, said Gozo was a tourist destination that cried out for an air strip like small islands such as Lampedusa, Pantelleria, Marina di Campo. “We are not talking jumbo jets here, but small aircraft. Frankly I cannot understand what the controversy is all about. An airstrip will lead to quality tourism and general aviation growth. The market is there, I know from personal experience. Gozo can be put in the itinerary of commuter companies which operate to various small islands.”

He suggested the government convene a committee of local pilots and other interested people to push the project forward.

Leading Gozitan businessman John Magro said he backed all forms of accessibility to Gozo. “I would like Gozo to be better linked to the rest of the world, not just Malta. Of course, we need to protect the environment, but we are not talking of some Boeing here. Compromises are found all over the world, and I am sure we can in Gozo as well,” he said.

The Gozo Business Chamber last year also called for existing facilities to be extended so that small fixed-wing aircraft could operate to Gozo.

A government spokesman when questioned did not rule anything out but was non-committal.

“The option for a new air link operation between Malta and Gozo remains open and given the right sustainable business case the government will not exclude anything.

“Any decision will be taken in view of the government's strong commitment to the environment and the economic growth of Gozo that relies on sustainable tourism for its prosperity, which is at the heart of the 'ecological island' concept."

And some of the comments below make an interesting reading:

Comments

Victor G.mercieca (on 2/6/08)

An example of an ECO Island airstrip please visit www.ladyelliot.com.au

Roy Perry (on 2/6/08)

I wish to thank all of you who have commented. I will make some brief points of clarification.
1. Will somebody please take me to see the cart ruts and Roman remains in the area so that they can be identified and protected?
2. There could be cultural benifits if an investor would give something back to Gozo, for example, to restore and put back into use the nearby Medaeival Chapel of St. Cecilia which is not being cared for.
3. The land it is proposed to use is derelict, strewn with heaps of builders rubble, rusting trucks and trailers.
4. The seaplane is NOT an option for persons travelling from MIA to Gozo, they will only carry 10Kgs of baggage and are not suitable for the elederly (nor will they carry a Guide Dog)
5. Perhaps a referendum is too strong a word. 18 months ago Malta Surveys carried out a questionnaire of just 342 persons.
6. There are other aspects of the plan that will benefit Gozo. A reservoir for the beleagured farmers, training for aviators, exciting aerial events to thrill spectators.=

Victor G.Mercieca (on 31/5/08)

Just few lines after reading all these comments from people living across the 2 sister islands of approval & disapproval to basically transforming a derelict Heliport into a small operational airfield, an airstrip pretty much like any road which can also be a grass runway too, not to upset the sentiments of the archaelogists & environmentalists, it can retain the status quo of the location. (Nobody complained about the uncompleted horse race track project that destroyed very arable land in the heart of Gozo?) It seems to me that most of the people who disapprove are retired or do not have the need to commute across the channel, or the have some hidden interest to keep things from evolving for the common good, this project is aimed in making Gozo very accessible from MIA & from as many other small airfields across Europe & beyond. General Aviation is a huge industry that will put Gozo on the MAP, it has missed out on at least 40 years of light aviation services depriving many from comfortable commuting in shorter times, for work or pleasure needs....usually you people object out of Egoism, Short Sighteness,Fear of change,Misconceptions or have no idea why ecc...

D. Gauci (on 30/5/08)

The minute somebody mentiones that there should be a referendum in Gozo about it, to me it means, Gozo is a republic. I don't recall we having a referendum for sliema residents whether to allow high rise (very ugly) flats. A referendum amongst M'scala or Maltese residents only to have a recycling plant there. ...the story goes on for other places..Mount Maghtab, hotels in bugibba, etc..
When are you people going to realise that the Gozitans alone do not have more right to Gozo over the Maltese as much as us Maltese have more right over Malta than the Gozitans. I would get quite offended if somebody said...this thing is in Malta and Gozitans should not interfere., its none of their business. The same goes the other way round. What about Comino ? Who decides there ? The one family of 3 members who reside there ? Lets make arguments that unite us Maltese (including Gozitans who some might have forgotten they are Maltese people) rather than arguments that devide us. Why not have a referendum amongst Gozitans on whether Maltese should have a visa issued to go to Gozo ?

David Saliba (on 30/5/08)

While agreeing that an Airstrip in Gozo would be of an advantage to tourists, Gozitans, Maltese and Aviation fanatics alike...i am sure there are definitily various other better options of investment to improve the Appearance and Economic growth of Gozo. The Government should concentrate mainly on continuing to invest on new roads, taking care of National heritage, and building New facilities to keep Gozo recognized and up to date with Malta and the rest of the world. Not to mention the need of the long awaited Sport facilities….like the National Pool which has been for many years. So how about seeing what the majority really want, by having professional surveys, thus the government could convene a committee of interested people to push wanted and truly needed projects forward !!

C. E Taliana (on 29/5/08)

There can be two facades to this issue -

1. Who does not want to ruin the environment and keep Gozo as is
2. Who is pro-airstrip.

The challenges the latter option would face would be feasibility. If an operator that is ready to operate with several cost contstraints is found then welcome the 1000 mtr strip, but I seriously doubt that an operator would draw up a proposal that would be cost-effecient.

Yes the helicopter service was expensive, but a fixed wing won'e be that cheap either. Apart from operational constraints, if the Govt would not subsidise such service, I am afraid the the loads required to make the service feasible are much higher than the actual loads.

This goes deeper into the structure of the plan. A proper plan should be drawn up for all interested parties. Will this airstrip be targeted towards tourists only, or should it be targeted towards the daily commuters as well?

I the airstrip infrastructure is not the biggest cost problem.
The real issue Is finding an operator that would find the route commercially viable.

Alfred Farrugia (on 29/5/08)

40 years ago I used to cross from Malta to Gozo and back every day to teach at the Lyceum in Victoria. In the morning I used to take the Gozo ferry from Marfa, and in the afternoon I used to take the hydrofoil (Aliscaf) to Valletta, to pursue an evening course for my first degree at the university in St. Paul’s Street. Most of the time I used to be the only passenger in the afternoon, possibly because of the cost and the timing. Things have obviously changed since then.

Care has to be taken against over-development, while we consider the needs of the Gozitans themselves. I have an open mind on the subject, but we must make sure that we do not ruin Gozo instead of making it better. We have already ruined the charm of Malta, including Sliema. Does anybody remember the Sliema front and the distinctive two-storey buildings at Tower Road? One needs to go to Brighton in the UK to see similar buildings! We need to find the right balance between sustainable development and the environment, and Gozo should not be an exception.

Joe Vella (on 29/5/08)

No, it is time to finish this nonsense, that the best future for Gozo is for it to stay the crib (presepju) that only few pensioners, now want it to be. Gozo needs to evolve and progress just as every other island or country in the world. It needs modern and effective infrastructure that can assure it communication and connection not only with Malta but with the rest of the world. It needs an airstrip, good roads and sea links just like any other island. It needs this infrastructure to support its population and it industry too, if there is still any.

Gozo has increased it numbers of people looking for a job. It five star hotels are a thing of the past, many have been transformed into ugly block of flats. Industry is nearly non existent.

If we do not start to act now, Gozo will truly become the crib (presepju) that the old want it to be. I am sure that we can preserve and develop the island at the same time. All that is needed is tough control and well though projects which do not waste our space and money. Joe Vella Victoria

Joe Martinelli (on 29/5/08)

It seems to me that all the discussions evolve around two principles namely: Feasibility and Desireability of having the airstrip.
As far as feasibility is concerned, a business plan by interested parties should provide a fairly clear picture. If negative, there would be no reason to proceed further. If positive, then it will be a question of desireability.
It is not really fair for the inhabitants of Malta to impose a decision on their compatriots in Gozo and hence my initial suggestion that a referendum in Gozo should be held.
Someone raised the issue of a bridge between the mainland and Gozo. The investment needed would be enormous compared to an airstrip although the advantages would be greater. If a bridge had to be built, no doubt it would be a toll bridge even if the return on the investment is amortized over fifty years. How about maintenance? Maintenance on bridges usually starts at one end and by the time it reaches the other end, it would be time to start all over again.
In a perfect world Gozitans would have enough industry (tourist and other) to sustain full employment, therefore the daily crossings to Malta would become unnecessary.

M Borg (on 28/5/08)

@Mr Abela.

The seaplane service is not the service the tourists are looking for. We are discussing an aircraft taking off and landing at Malta International Airport and not at Valletta Waterfront. How many travellers crossed between Malta and Gozo and vice versa with the seaplane compared to how many used to travel with the helicopter? And the helicopter was quite expensive, a fixed wing will be quite cheaper. Regarding noise pollution, the aircraft in question definately makes less noise when compared to the helicopter.

A. Attard (on 28/5/08)

@ M Borg.

I am a gozitan and i agree having a bridge between Malta and Gozo. If you live in Gozo and you have to travel to Malta everyday you'll change your idea! We have to wake up at 4am to make it to the ferry and to the place of work in Malta. we have to do this everyday. And stop this pathetic 'oh my oh my' pls.

Saviour Sam Agius (on 28/5/08)

Gozo's charm comes from the fact that it is isolated. It is still virgin to a certain extent. Some tourists I've met were disappointed by the fact that there's a Mc Donalds' outlet there for the simple reason that their main intention in going to Gozo was to get away from everything that makes everywhere so similar these days. I'm therefore against this proposition.
However, having said that, I'm for a referendum in Gozo on the issue. After all it's the Gozitans who should have the say. If they give the go ahead then we can get it over and done with. If they refuse, then we should stop bringing this topic up year after year.

Liam Kelly (on 28/5/08)

Does Gozo REALLY need an airstrip? isn't the whole reason why Gozo is a popular retreat for Maltese due to the fact that it provides a peaceful escape from the mainland?...you won't get much peace with an airfield on your doorstep I'm afraid.

Besides which, is it really feasible? a 19 seater aircraft operating to Malta only (there's absolutely no chance that flights to Tunisia or Sicily would even come close to making money) so is this really tearing up even more green areas to tarmac over ?

I don't think i even need to argue the case from a environmental point of view.

We've already got one airport which is grossly under-used in Malta...do we really need another?

D. Abela (on 28/5/08)

80% of what Mr. Borg ?
80% of Gozitan tourists are Maltese holiday makers.
the rest, 80% of what 1000 people? 10,000 people ? 100,000 people ? 1 Million people ? Because you need large numbers to make a small airport and the same airplanes worth the investment.
And even if, there are 10,000 people heading straight to Gozo, what makes you think that more than a few hundred will use the air service ? Do all those 80% of tourists use the current seaplane service ? I doubt it.
The issue here is whether an airport and the airplane service will be viable or not, I doubt Mr. Borg has done the re-search about its sustainability.

M Borg (on 28/5/08)

Gozo's double insularity makes us at a disadvantage with our mainland counterparts. This is a problem not only with Gozo, but with all SIS (Small Island States). If we take a pro-rata Government investment in Gozo vis a vis Govt investment in Malta, we can sure see that we are laid back! Gozo's economy is in a bad state, and yes, if it was not for the local tourists who cross over for the weekend, i doubt what will happen to Gozo. Gozitans pay taxes also, so why do we have to pay a high social and political cost as well?! Actions need to be taken! GREENS were against Victor Borg when he planned to build private property at Ta Cenc. Have any of them voiced their concerns at Tigne Development? Dr Gonzi, if you are not going to take action on a serious TOURISM plan for GOZO, together with the main investors in Tourism in Gozo, Gozo's economy will be directed to a natural death in the long run! An airstrip is the first thing to approve.

M Borg (on 28/5/08)

Oh my oh my! Who is coming with the idea of building a bridge or tunnel instead of an airstrip "not to ruin Gozo"??? Building a bridge between Malta and Gozo will result in Gozo loosing its identity and being and extended part of Malta. Many Maltese will 're-locate' to the peaceful island, since it won't be difficult to cross over every day! What does this mean? A greater demand for property in Gozo, property prices will rise, and more businessman will therefore invest in building more 'concrete monsters' like in Tigne! Will Gozo remain the same? Definately not!

@ Denis Abela: am sure you are not into the Gozitan tourism business. Do you know that approximately over 80% of the tourists visiting Gozo, do not visit Malta as part of their holiday? (they only use Malta Airport and just travel to Cirkewwa only).

@ James Tyrrell: taking your argument, if a Gozitan never crosses over to Malta, and never uses the 'excellent' services of Gozo 'Do-what-you-like-when-you-like' Channel, we can remove this service as well.

Gozo needs investment under supervision!

James A. Tyrrell (on 27/5/08)

To even consider such a thing as an airstrip on Gozo is madness. I just wish the people who propose such things would stop using tourists like myself as an excuse to destroy the island of Gozo. Does Gozo need an airstrip? No. Do I as a tourist want an airstrip on Gozo? No. If an airstrip is built on Gozo will I as a tourist use it? No.
The only people who will benefit from such an exercise are the developers and investors who would make it happen, and of course the people in Government accepting the odd brown envelope to push things through!

Emanuel Bajada (on 27/5/08)

@ G Theuma, You are right in your comment, Gozo is not a republic and Gozitans are fully fledged citzens of the republic of Malta at least that's what the costitution says but.....last april saw unemployment go down -650 yet it went up in Gozo +25 to which republic these belong? In case why are we discriminated? If you are in Gozo and need urgent hospitalization, forget the state of art Hospital of Mater DEJN even though you have contributed by your taxes!!
@ all anti airstrip I invite you to come and take abode here and then after experiencing life in Gozo for at least 3 months give your opinion.
My conviction after having lived here 50 years :-
Gozo does not need an airstrip for all it matters. Let's take one strong political decision. Let's build a bridge so that there will be no need for a different policy for Gozo anymore. But in the absence of this physical link ,for the short term an airstrip is a must- a pain reliever if you like. And no sir, an airstrip will not have any big impact or contribution towards an increase in tourism .

John Mizzi (on 27/5/08)

The Gozo Airport cannot happen at Ta Lambert because the area is full or archaeological sites such as cart ruts, Roman vine canals, monoliths, very old Girna and prehistoric mounds on both sides of the heliport. The cultural tourists come to Gozo to visit such sites and to destroy more of these sites is total madness. The runway seems to be almost touching the tranquil and amazing bay and valley of Mgarr ix-Xini! This will have be a huge negative impact on Gozo tourism!

Charles Sammut (on 27/5/08)

It is amusing how someone has managed to cry "Rape" and suggest building a bridge in the same breath! It seems that some expect to keep their cake and eat it too.
Do the Gozitans want quality tourists or the uncouth hordes which cross on the ferry from Malta every long weekend which comes along and make a nuisance of themselves? Because at the moment that is what makes up the bulk of tourism to Gozo. Do they want the convenience of being able to drive over to Malta (and vice versa) via a bridge or do they want to enjoy their splendid isolation? Perhaps KMB was right after all! Independence for Gozo .......... and a visa requirement for travellers too.

Corey Attard (on 27/5/08)

Please, Leave Gozo the way it is ,stop destroying farmers property, we'r not a tourist island in Gozo there is no history at all .All we have is rocks and cactus.What you gonna show the tourist, Gozo doesn't wanna become like Malta high drugs ,crime,and over populated.We wanna live in peace on this quiet island.

G Zammit (on 27/5/08)

If Gozo needs more tourists and business, then it's not an airstrip that lacks, but a free of charge bridge or tunnel. One does not need a fortune teller to guess what will happen to Gozo, another concrete jungle well competing with Sliema and Bugibba.

And to whom is stating that due to bad weather Gozo is isolated, who is going to find a licensed pilot who risks his life and that of others, flying a single engine aircraft in force 5 or 6 wind, which is fairly common even in summer?

Alison Natalie Keeler (on 27/5/08)

Hoorah that the accessibility issue is once again being raised. I occasionally arrived or left Gozo in the heli as its only passenger. Surely this was madness albeit hugely thrilling to experience private travel, as it were. Gozo needs additional accessibility beyond the brilliant service of Gozo Channel... As long as impact matters are studied and considered, surely this must be a good thing if we are talking a handful of flights in small craft.

G. Theuma (on 27/5/08)

@Mario Camilleri. Just a short point to you and to people who reason like you:
We should let the people of Gozo decide for themselves only when Gozo becomes an independent republic. Until then, it is the people of the Maltese Islands that will decide.

mario camilleri (on 27/5/08)

Let the people of Gozo decide for themselves.

Alex Ellul (on 27/5/08)

@ the anti-runway lobby: By analogy, do we Maltese residents remove the runways at Luqa/Gudja and start taking a ferry boat to Catania? Let's not kill the runway notion while targeting the real environment killers. The environment is suffering badly without a runway already. If we are not careful, in twenty, forty years even without a runway, Gozo as we know it would be finished. Even with a runway it may become so too, but not because of the runway, but due to our egoism.

mario gauci (on 27/5/08)

It should be built on reclaimed land from the see. A little more expensive but worth it in the end. Ask our friends the Chinese or Dutch for their expertise and tap funds from the EU.

Joe Martinelli (on 27/5/08)

"Keeping Gozo away from Malta will help it remain the Gozo we all love", one commented. Who's 'we'? We, Maltese or we, Gozitans?
The subject of an airstrip comes up regularly and as usual there are those who propose and those who oppose. Why not ask Gozitans who are mostly affected by whether to have it or not? A quick referendum in Gozo would dispel any doubt and the government should respect their decision.
The government is correct at evaluating a long term business plan before making any decisions since more than one helicopter enterprise failed.
Personally I think that a small fixed wing aircraft facility will meet with success and result in an increase in tourist visits plus a much better business connection point for both Gozitan and foreign executives.
The noise factor is hardly an excuse since the frequency of the flights can be regulated and the location of the proposed airstrip is such that most often any noise of landing craft will be over the sea, very much like the present seaplane arrangement.
Barring the airstrip will handicap the Gozitans' tourism opportunities, however, it is up to them to make a decision once and for all.

Miriam Galea (on 27/5/08)

Is this the idea of GonziPN of turning gozo in an ecological island?
It seems that after taking up the concept from Alternattiva Demokratika’s book, gonzipn did not know what it was copying. Gozitans want employment and sustainable development in practice not mere words.

Dr. David Pollina (on 27/5/08)

As a pilot, I feel that Mr. Perry's solution is absolutely ideal. The big issue - and rightly so - with prior plans to extend the helipad was the noise factor in Ghanjsielem which would have been right in the approach/departure path. This solution is fabulous, and I for one would be glad to serve on any commission pushing it forward.

As one also professionally involved in the tourism industry, I know that having such an airstrip would benefit Gozo considerably. It will definitely not result in any loss of Gozo's charm or character. The noise from small aircraft is actualy less than that which was put up with for years from the old helicopter service - and there could be Gozo direct links to/from Italy, etc.

Brilliant idea!

L Galea (on 27/5/08)

STOP this continuous attempted rape of Gozo.

What happened to the once proposed bridge between Malta and Gozo which will solve all the problems including the stoppage of transport when the weather is not good.

Let the Malta Shipyards where they have the necessary knowledge in steel work and maintenance work build the bridge and maintain it and kill more than two birds with one stone.

Save the shipyards and save Gozo while providing the necessary link without continuing to rape Gozo.

An additional idea would be to mount a number of wind turbine generators on the bridge, thus making it pay for its own maintenance through the electricity generated.

Dennis Abela (on 27/5/08)

I've thought about this from various points. To me though, I would give thumbs up to the SMALL airstrip. Why ? Becuase that will only be the means to prove that it will not at the end of the day be worthy. The airstrip could then be converted back to agriculture land.

Who in his right senses will fork out a considerable amount of money just to land in Gozo when travelling by bus/car is probably cheaper and more scenic. Yes, like in everything in this world there are such people, however not enough in the long run to make this a good profitable investment. Tourists would mostly likely want to spend time in Malta before venturing to Gozo. Landing direcly to Gozo and then going to Malta ...to me, does not make too much sense. With aviation fuel rocketing, expenses going up in the air it makes more sense to consolidate service rather than spread them (repeatedly) over two airports.

Dr. Ivan X. Gatt (on 27/5/08)

A few months ago AOPA (Malta) made a power point presentation to the Gozo Business Chamber and members of the Gozo Tourism Association regarding the possibility of establishing an airstrip on Gozo. In the limited time available we tried to cover all aspects such as, land segregation, noise, impact assessment, type of aircraft to be used and so on. Needless to say the presentation was well received, regrettably communications sent to the ministry for Gozo on this subject, remain unanswered. Gozo is double insulated and relies upon Malta for all its requirements. Allowing Gozo to have an airstrip would give it that little bit of independence is so desperately needs. Flights can be be organised directly to neighbouring islands including Sicily. It can very easily attract upmarket clients as it would be considered a nearby destination for pilots willing to explore the charms of this lovely island. With the right type of aircraft and proper landscaping, Gozo's environment would not be effected and its beauty would still be retained. AOPA (Malta) has and will always support such a project.

M Borg (on 27/5/08)

Mr Delia, could you please let us know how come that having an airstrip "will change the Gozo we know"?


Can someone quantify how many tourists Gozo is losing annually because of the difficulty in accessibility? Many tourists choose not to visit Gozo, especially in Winter, since they will have early flights. Do any Maltese know what it means for a Gozitan who need to travel abroad and sometimes have to leave home about 5 or even more hours before the flight, in order to be in time at the airport? Or can any Maltese justify the fact that when Gozitans arrive from abroad late evening/early morning in Winter (when ferries stop do not operate frequently), we have to find accommodation in Malta for the night, or otherwise sleep in our cars at Cirkewwa?? Gozo NEEDS the airstrip. Gozo needs more tourists, and more high-class tourists, Gozo needs to be developed, without ruining the countryside. A 1000m airstrip will definitely NOT take all the open space of GOZO.

Martin Büttner (on 27/5/08)

Go ahead! Destroy more lanscape! Asphalt and concrete instead of greeneries, this is what we all need! And how nice is the noise of a propeller. Go ahead and ruin the place. Ruin Gozo. Then you will see how tourism develops.
What about the seaplane air-link? No 1000-m-runway needed, no take-off and landing noise in the villages of Gozo, no extra heavy traffic to another area of the tiny island.
Come on! If you want an airstrip in Gozo, why don't you want a bridge?
Excuse me, but why do some Maltese want to spoil their country? Do they hate nature so much?
And hey, if Gozo gets an airstrip, Comino should also get one!

William Sultana (on 27/5/08)

Hold a referendum about the matter, and let the Gozitans decide what it's best for them!

A Farrugia (on 27/5/08)

This airstrip is a need for Gozo. Even KMBwanted to make this airstrip, so why not this Government?

Mario Mifsud (on 27/5/08)

Have you given a look around you at what is happening in Gozo? The character of the island is already being destroyed with extensive building all around. It is this that is destroying the tranquility of Gozo. An air strip would not increase tourism enmasse but only restricted to quality tourism that would leave much more benefit and less damage than the stampede generated by Notte Gozitane and such like occurrences

Massimo Farrugia (on 27/5/08)

The economic feasability of such a project needs to be considered thoroughly before a decision as drastic is taken. Would small aircraft flights really solve the accessibility problem of Gozo? Would the money spent be worthwhile? Would the environmental cost be worthwhile if weighed against the overall gain for Gozo? If we are talking of giving better access to Gozo's industry which exports produce abroad, then we are certainly talking of larger planes than the "small fixed wing" aircraft carrying a score of passengers from Tunisia or Sicily, and perhaps a strip that is larger than one km. (Experts please advise).
Anyone who has been to Lampedusa's main harbour, which is not larger than Mgarr (Gozo), knows how disturbingly deafining the sound of a landing jet is if you're dining in one of the small fish restaurants in the evening. (Lampedusa is just under than half the size of Gozo). I'm not saying the project is impossible but we just can't have the cake and eat it.
Pilots never leave anything to chance before flying. The same goes for such a project: if it's allowed to take off without the necessary precautions, it could be fatal.

Fabian Borg (on 27/5/08)

Keeping Gozo away from Malta will help it remain the Gozo we all love. Any closer it will just be another Maltese village and ADDIO AGRITOURISM and PEACEFUL BREAKS.

Martin de Bono (on 27/5/08)

Charles is 100% correct.

Gozo deserves much better. I do remember that Gozo was planned to be an ECO island with sustainable tourism. Therefore the Gov should take its stand and commit to make Gozo like so. Step one... officially announce that NO AIRSTRIP should be planned or actioned.

Let me remain Mr. Benetti that Lampedusa, Pantelleria and Marina di Campo are all very far away from any mainland, so it makes travel and tourism sense to have an airstrip there. But hey, what's all the fuss about? Gozo already has air travel... why do we need an other one?

Daniel Delia (on 27/5/08)

Gozo has been attractive for the novelty it is where more or less it is still unexploited unlike Malta. The fact that it is cut off from Malta has kept it that way so far. Having an airstrip will change the Gozo we know. The ones who are pro to an airstrip have money and business in mind and are very short sighted without considering the long term effect of such a development.
There are many other countries like for example Greece who do have an airstrip on every island. Besides the idea of an airstrip is becoming obsolete since the cost of fuels are rising so rapidly that less people will make use of an expensive means of transport.

Charles Flores (on 27/5/08)

An airstrip on Gozo would outrightly mean the end of this idyllic isle. Stop this nonsense. There is no doubt that, if approved, the strip would gradually develop into a fully-fledged airport at the price of a huge chunk of Gozitan countryside. Gozo deserves better and certainly cannot sustain this proposition. This is what Gozitans should be outraged about and not a mere ecclesiastical appointment!

The Times Editorial 16th February 2009

Monday, 16th February 2009

Editorial

The pros and cons of an airstrip in Gozo

Periodically, the issue surfaces of whether there should be an airstrip in Gozo capable of taking fixed-wing aircraft. Gozo can be reached by air either by seaplane, as is happening now from the Grand Harbour, or by helicopter, as was the case for some time. The commercial helicopter service - more than one attempt was made - ceased in 2005 and the only access now by rotor blade aircraft is when the Armed Forces of Malta's Air Wing is called upon in an emergency.

Are the arrangements now in place adequate to meet Gozo's requirements? Is there really a need for a fixed-wing airstrip in Gozo capable of ferrying passengers quickly between Malta and Gozo?

The arguments in favour of some form of airstrip in Gozo for fixed-wing aircraft focus on one key factor: the economic and tourism benefits of having a regular, efficient and reliable service between the two islands. For these reasons, the Gozo Tourism Association and the Gozo Business Chamber - together with one or two entrepreneurial proponents - have been at the forefront of such proposals. The government and the Gozo Ministry have opted for a more guarded approach.

It is argued that a seaplane operation cannot function when it is dark or the sea is rough. It stops flying in the winter months for these reasons but also, presumably, because it is not financially viable to operate in the lean, off-tourism winter months.

On the other hand, the arguments against the airstrip proposal come down to three. Would a year-round fixed-wing operation be commercially viable? What would be the social and environmental impact? And does Gozo really need it, anyway?

The commercial argument is central but, in a sense, should not be the over-riding consideration for the government. A commercial carrier would weigh up the business risks of undertaking such a venture. It would benefit from commercial success and would go to the wall if the venture failed. Either way, it would be no skin off the government's nose.

The social and environmental impact is more sensitive and more difficult to weigh up. The extension of the helipad at Xewkija by building a short runway would undoubtedly have environmental repercussions.

There would be a loss of agricultural land to development, or - if the idea of using the secondary road behind the heliport were adopted - a further extension of what is essentially an industrial footprint in the heart of what is being branded as an "ecological island".

The real imponderable, however, is what a regular and extended air link would do to Gozo's special, if not unique, attraction today as an island that is rather unspoilt, quiet and "behind the times", though not in a negative sense. Is there a danger that opening up Gozo to that kind of commercial air link would succeed in its objective of maximising tourism income at the cost of destroying the unique selling point of Gozo as a slightly mysterious island apart, ultimately undermining the very tourism it was seeking to attract?

In making a judgement on the best way ahead for Gozo one must beware the law of unintended consequences. Is a fixed-wing link truly needed? On balance, it is difficult not to feel that such an operation may be desirable although it may not be essential. It is also hard to demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that the present arrangements are undermining Gozo's core tourism business. On the contrary, it could be argued that by keeping Gozo slightly more difficult to reach, it actually enhances it.

GTA responds to comments on Gozo airlink

The Gozo Tourism Association refers to the editorial of the Times of Malta under the header The Pros and Cons of an airstrip in Gozo. In this opinion piece, the editor repeatedly implied that there is no real necessity for an airlink between the island of Gozo and mainland Malta.

The Gozo Tourism Association would like to remind the editor that the Government is forking out millions of euros to lure the low cost airlines to operate several routes not serviced by the legacy carriers, in order to make Malta more accessible to the potential tourists. Thus Government is acknowledging the fact that the success of the tourism industry depends also on further accessibility to the Maltese islands.

With the same reasoning, The Gozo Tourism Association is asking what is being done towards more access to the sister island of Gozo? The GTA has always argued that for Gozo the low cost carriers are a doubled edged knife. It is an acknowledged fact that the low cost carriers have improved the tourist numbers, but it is also a known fact that Gozo is losing out on the domestic market which is opting for breaks to destinations serviced by these airlines. Furthermore contrary to what is being done towards access in Malta, the island of Gozo experienced inconsistent, unfeasible and unrealiable airlinks previously operated by the helicopter and the present seaplane.

Furthermore the Gozo Tourism Association is conscious of and recognises the strength of island's unique character. However the GTA believes that the right balance is to be struck between maintaining Gozo's characteristics and sustaining the tourism industry which is the main economic pillar on Gozo.

The Gozo Tourism Association is not the enviromental expert. We are not either aviation experts. But we can proudly say that we are professionals and knowledgeable on what needs to be done to sustain the tourism sector on Gozo. We are, seasoned, experienced and tested daily and therefore our opinion should be heeded, if we want Gozo to remain as a tourist destination. Up to this present date, the Gozitan tourism trade was let down, with regards to the airlink between Malta and Gozo. No editorial board, whatever its agenda will ever understand the constraints of the Gozitan tourism industry, unless one lives it on a daily basis.

Finally the Gozo Tourism Association hopes that it was not the intention of the Times editorial to instigate another St. John's Co-Cathedral repeat.

The Gozo Tourism Association (The GOVANNA-Leaning Association)

The pros and cons of an airstrip in Gozo

I refer to the editorial in The Times of February 16, 2009 relating to the pros and cons of an airstrip in Gozo and to the article in your paper today.

This subject has been discussed many times in the past and while I agree that it would be convenient to have an air-shuttle service from Luqa to Gozo, a commercial venture would only be viable if it was heavily subsidised. Despite subsidies, the last service only managed to operate for a few months.

I think that it is grossly unfair for the people of Gozo and Malta to have to subsidize flights for tourists who can afford the prices, and business people whose flights are tax-deductible anyway!

Personally, I feel that as things stand now, the ferry connections are more than sufficient. In acute emergencies, an AFM helicopter is used. If business persons and well-off tourists really can't be bothered to travel on the ferry, they can always charter a private helicopter.

The sea plane is just a sight-seeing gimmick and serves no real purpose, except to disturb the peace and infringe on one's privacy.

If the hotel and tourist branch think that thousands of additional tourists will flock to Gozo if there is an air service, then I suggest that they are being taken for an expensive ride by their consultants, or are hallucinating!

From an environmental point of view - especially considering the 'ecological island' concept - one must realize that once the airstrip has been built it can never be 'un-built': that land will be destroyed forever.

Judging by what it costs to build roads on Gozo, the cost of extending the runway would run into millions of Euro. At present, the government cannot even keep the main arterial roads in a reasonable condition, so how on earth can they maintain an airstrip? Fixed wings planes cannot miss potholes like most helicopters can!

If a commercial fixed-wing venture failed, the government would be left with an expensive airstrip and no business - I would certainly not say that that was 'no skin off the government's nose'!

Once an airstrip has been built, it will also be utilized by flying schools and private planes. It would be very difficult to limit the use of the airstrip to one commercial company only. Even if this was possible, there would be so many 'exceptions' and 'emergency landings' that it would be a farce. Let us not kid ourselves with regard to the status of some residents.

I lived near a small airport on the outskirts of Munich for some years and I can assure you that the noise of small aircraft monotonously buzzing overhead is most irritating.

Thank goodness we only have a few visiting aircraft here at present (the float plane is unable to fly much in winter), however sitting in the sun and enjoying the bay at Xlendi on Monday afternoon there was one circling the area. Although it didn't bite like a mosquito, it had the same effect - one just wanted to swat it down!

The charm of Gozo is, as the editorial mentioned, the fact that it is still relatively unspoilt, fairly unique and slightly more difficult to reach! Let's keep it that way.

Many Maltese and foreigners have purchased property here because the island is so special - why?

Why do so many Gozitans who emigrated elsewhere in the world, always keep a foothold here on the island?

The tourists who visit the island - especially in the shoulder months and winter, when we need them most - are not looking for a stereotype destination. They want to enjoy the magnificent cliffs and ravines, the sparkling seas, thunder clouds and rainbows, wild flowers and fascinating rock formations, but possibly most of all, the peace and tranquillity they can find in the countryside. They most certainly do not want the noise pollution and invasion of privacy caused by noisy little aircraft!

Basically it boils down to:

Pros: convenience for the few, and

Cons: inconvenience to the whole population!

Lesley Kreupl

Gharb