Expectations of a Gozo Businessman

Joseph G. Grech, is the CEO of the Gozo Business Chamber. He is a businessman. Right. Gozitans are fully aware what type of business Mr. Grech is into! The rumour goes that if you need a MEPA permit approval, better join in the Grechs. This is his contribution on The Times today.

I refer to the letter by Franco J. Scicluna titled Serious Inter-island Air Service (July 25).

The Gozo Business Chamber has always been, and still is, in favour of an airlink between the two islands.

The Chamber is worried that no air service is in force at present because this is detrimental to Gozo's economy.

The recent presentation about the airlink made by Roy Perry, in conjunction with the Gozo Business Chamber, was made with the aim of creating more awareness of the great need for an early decision by the relevant authorities. The Chamber is of the opinion that the airlink should be serviced by small fixed-wing planes. We also hope that the proposal presented in the Pre-Budget Document by the Ministry of Finance, the Economy and Investment to "study effective ways for reintroducing a reliable air transport service to and from Gozo" will result in concrete action in the shortest time possible.

The pros (and cons?) of an airlink for Gozo

It is becoming clearer that the Roy Perry's lobby group is working on a planned strategy, that of provoking the public reaction towards embracing an airstrip on the Isle of Calypso nymph.

Nothing wrong with that.

David Carrington also an ex-pat from Sannat and a friend of Roy Perry did his bid on today's Times.
In his letter called 'The pros of an airlink for Gozo' says thus:

I would like to support the sentiments expressed by Franco Scicluna on the question of an airlink for Gozo (July 25). I, too, was at Roy Perry's recent presentation and some key points arose which the government ought to be actively considering.

First, it is no longer feasible to consider the option of a helicopter service as being economically viable, especially in these days of exponentially increasing fuel costs. Fixed wing aircraft are several times cheaper to run.

Second, certain types of fixed wing aircraft have been successful linking many island communities similar to ours in the Mediterranean, in northern Europe, the Caribbean, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific. There are precedents on which to draw experience.

Third, Gozo's economy suffers from double insularity. It would benefit from having wider direct links to the outside world.

Fourth, Ryannair is understood to be establishing a route to Ragusa in Sicily. Gozo is closer to Sicily than Malta. Joining up with a major airline directly and cutting Luqa and Cirkewwa out of the loop would be attractive to incoming tourists, residents and, perhaps, commuting businessmen alike.

Fifth, the footprint required to establish a suitable airstrip would not impact the environment adversely, if the existing heliport and its immediate, largely moribund, hinterland were to be utilised. The ensuing runway would be measured in hundreds, not thousands, of metres.

Sixth, if investment in a new airstrip takes place, the opportunity for spin-off benefits are readily apparent. One that is being mooted is the opportunity to build a massive underground reservoir to take water run-off from the winter downpours. We all know that water is going to be a key issue in the decades to come. The Eco Island strategy would benefit (particularly as the EU are looking for tangible ideas to justify support).

Seventh, why does the public purse have to be utilised exclusively? If a public-private partnership is considered there is at least one foreign entrepreneur who is known to be interested in investing in infrastructure.

To my certain knowledge, Mr Perry has put years of research into the question of a sustainable airlink for Gozo, with no expectation of reward - other than perhaps seeing a dream realised. Now, opinion on the ground is growing that something ought to be done. The least the Government could do would be to acknowledge this. But platitudes are no longer enough. There needs to be some form of tangible action.

Next action might be for Price Waterhouse, or equivalent, to be commissioned to do a preliminary opportunity-risk assessment, on which a business case might be built. This should be wide-ranging, involving public opinion, business opinion, technical and financial feasibility, price-modelling, ROI estimates - and particularly include such questions as whether overseas companies would be more interested in investing in Gozo and perhaps regenerating the dilapidated Xewkija Industrial Estate (perhaps rebranded as "Smart Village"? But that is another story!). Certainly a holistic approach, for the benefit of the island, would make sense.

This letter is intended to provoke. There will no doubt be others, both for and against. But if you go to www.gozoairlink.blogspot.com you will see just where public opinion is on this right now. I hope the government in its broader sense (not just our ministry) takes note.

On-line Poll on Gozo airstrip

The Malta Surveys.Com website carried out an online survey asking whether an airstrip for fixed-wing aircrafts be built on Gozo.

Here is the result.
The poll took place between 10th may and 20th June 2008.

Read more by clicking here.

Convenience versus the politics of Conviction

Way back on the 22nd Novermber 2006, the Cabinet asked MEPA for guidelines on extending Gozo airstrip.

I found this report on the Business Today newspaper - a report by Karl Stagno-Navarra.

It said that the Government was set to ask the Malta Environment and Planning Authority for guidelines over the proposed extension of the current Xewkija heliport and to turn it into a landing strip, capable of allowing a light fixed-wing aircraft to service Gozo’s tourism needs.

Business Today was informed that the issue regarding the use of fixed-wing aircraft as an alternative to the now defunct helicopter service has been discussed informally in Cabinet, early that week of November 2006.

The then Minsiter Censu Galea, and Giovanna Debono have recently been approached by potential operators as well as constituted bodies who have urged them to consider the proposal seriously. It has been decided that an ad hoc committee has been set up made up of the representatives of various sectors to compile an assessment and report back to ministers on the options and viability of such a service.

Members of MEPA are represented in the committee and have already carried out an onsite inspection.

Speaking to Business Today, Gozo minister Giovanna Debono explained that government still has all its options open including analysing the proposal for a wet ease by Helisureste.

An expression of interest would be drafted only after the assessment report is completed. Government has also said it could opt for an open market.

“Government is moving speedily on this matter,” Debono told this newspaper.

Yesterday night, Opposition leader Alfred Sant said Labour’s proposal was to subsidise the helicopter service.

Synergy Aviation of Surrey, UK was the first company to register its interest with government to offer a fixed-wing airlink service between Malta and Gozo.

In an interview with Business Today, 35-year-old pilot and Synergy Aviation director Glen Heavens reveals his intentions to service the two islands with a seven to nine-seater Islander aircraft, and offer it at Lm25 with return.

While explaining that all he needs is an extra 220 metres of airstrip at the existing Xewkija heliport in Gozo, Glen Heavens explains that he is interested in servicing Gozo with its immediate neighbours in the region, introducing flights to
Palermo, Catania, Reggio Calabria,Lampedusa, Pantelleria, Tunis and Tripoli.

The furthest flight-time is estimated to be one hour and ten minutes, while flying between Malta and Gozo would take less than ten minutes.

Glen Heavens’s project is thoroughly supported by the business community in Gozo, and
both the Gozo Tourism Association and the Gozo Business Chamber have voiced their support for the initiative, and are recommending to government that the fixed-wing operation is the best way forward.

The news about Synergy Aviation, revealed last week by this paper, has triggered quite some interest amongst different sectors. Synergy executives have this week met with Air Malta officials over passenger handling,and were reported to have been
“extremely good”.

May I remind the readers of this blog that all this occurred in 2006.

I never heard of the outcome of the workings of the ad hoc committee. Did you?

I don't know neither what happened to the studies compiled and the assessment (if these ever took place). Do you?

Did you hear anything about MEPA's guidelines? I did not.

Do I know of the options and viability of such a service?
Answer is NO.



Conclusion: This is an example of politics run by conveniences and not by convictions.

The businessmen are marching in...ouch ouch

The Times of Malta decided to give a short account of the presentation of his idea of an airstrip for Gozo The Times reported thus: "A blind Gozitan resident made a presentation on the long-running idea of building an airstrip allowing small passenger aircraft to land in Gozo."

Roy S. Perry, a blind ex-pat residing in Qala, expressed frustration saying that "Gozitan organisations have not exerted enough pressure on the government to improve tourist numbers on the island."

Frank Salt, obviously a supporter of the idea, noted that "It takes a blind man to put forward sensible ideas that will halt the decline in commerce and tourism."

The meeting was concluded with a resolve to form a working party of businessmen who will be approaching the government.

Ouch ouch....the businessmen are coming in.... Once again, several Times readers added their comments on the Times on-line, including those by Roy Perry himself and his wife Josie Perry. Then we have people like the Irish James A. Tyrrell - a regular contributor for the gozonews.com

The comments follow here:

L Galea

There is no need to continue destroying Gozo and increase the noise pollution from aircraft.

As I have already suggested what is needed is a bridge to solve the Shipyard problems, the installation of wind generators on the bridge itself to allievate the energy problem, and the provision of a continuous means of transport between Malta and Gozo solving the problem for Maltese and Gozitans and tourists, especially in an emergency.

Why do businessmen see nothing except their own narrow private interests instead of the common interest of the Maltese and Gozitan people?

Why are they so intent on continuing to destroy more land in both Malta and Gozo?

Leslie Mirasole

There is no need to spoil a large piece of land just for some silly little planes. when Gozo is served better by sea.

E Camilleri
Finally we have a fixed wing sea plane between malta-gozo, why the insistence to continue destroying the last few open spaces? Having an airstrip to increase gozo tourism is false. Leave Gozo in its remaining natural state and then only you can boost tourism or at least keep the numbers.

Maria Dolores Fenech
So Gozo would have a heliport which is no longer functional due to high fees, but an airstrip to accomodate a few businessmen! Would the Gozitans allow this to happen in their (still) unspoilt beautiful island?

James A. Tyrrell

Just what Gozo needs, a big concrete scar covering part of the island. Frank Salt talks about the decline in commerce and tourism. What decline? Everything I've read from the MTA has failed to mention any decline. Stop trying to fool the public with these lies. If anything is going to have a long-term effect on tourism it is the continued destruction of the island by so-called Gozitans and Maltese who care more about making a buck than caring for the environment. Having said that I have no doubt that the party of businessmen will be well received by the Government, as the present Government are nothing short of environmental rapists. As we have already seen just apply enough pressure and perhaps take along a big enough envelope and you will get your wish. Once the tourist trade dries up you can use the airstrip as foundations for high-rise apartments and fill them with illegal immigrants who will be the only people interested in going to Gozo!

Josie Perry

My Husband has spent many years studying the various ideas to improve communications between Malta and Gozo. A bridge will do more to harm the environment during the construction phase than any other civil engineering project. It would have to be in two sections via Comino and would totally destroy the environment in that island. In addoition to that there is the landfall site at Qala with new roads having to be built at both ends. At the pace of construction here it will be 50 years before this is complete. All we ask for is a small airfield to accommodate small aircraft with a link to Sicily for businessmen as well as richer tourist who find it stressful to trqavel by road. Why should Malta have the benefits of these visitors and not Gozo?

James A. Tyrrell

What Gozo needs Josie is what Gozo had before and lost due to lack of Government support, a helicopter service. This could easily accommodate the businessmen between Malta, Gozo and Sicily as well as catering for the tourists willing to pay that bit extra for the privilege of getting to Gozo quicker. Another problem you didn't raise with regard to the bridge idea would be the increase of crime on Gozo due to the direct road access.

L Galea

No Josie A bridge will not do any more harm. It will provide work for the shipyard workers during construction and maintenance, provide occasion to build a windfarm on the same bridge to reduce Malta's dependence on fossil fuels and thus better the environment and the exchequer's balance, and provide an uninterruptible road service to the Maltese and Gozitan people including TOURISTS who will enjoy a breathtaking view of the channel, and which will be extremely useful when incliment weather prevents any other means of transport from operating, including smal aircraft and helicopters. And why may I ask will a bridge ruin Comino's environment? By allowing easier access to Maltese, Gozitans and tourists? Or do you want it to be reserved for certain types of persons whoever and whatever they be who like isolation from other people's eyes? Would you perhaps recommend such a project in your home country which you have left Mrs Perry?

Victor G. Mercieca
These very negative people who oppose rapid air commuting most likely have a good eye sight but prefer not to see! Airplanes are not silly, they are man's best invention which greatly enhances anybody's life in more ways then one, it seems these people have no idea & are installing a false picture! Maybe they prefer the site in question to continue be used as a dump site & a derelict heliport! Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association USA A valued member since 1993 # 01161606

James A. Tyrrell

Victor the comments in question are not negative, at least from the point of view of caring about the island of Gozo and its environment. Gozo is approximately 9 miles by 4 miles and you think it would be a good idea to cover yet more of it in concrete. I don't think so. To build an airstrip here would not only create an ugly concrete scar on the island; it would also destroy ancient cart ruts and rare plants. But that's okay so long as the few can benefit. I can guarantee you that if this ever happens in no time at all some idiot will be calling for it to be extended so that international flights can land, and if the right palms are greased I've no doubt that would happen too. The area in question by the way was being used as a dumpsite long before the helicopter service pulled out. Gozo does not and never will need an airstrip in the same way that it does not need a marina at Hondoq. The time has long since passed when people need to wake up and give this island treasure what it really needs, protection

Eugenio Taliana
During bad weather the seaplane does not operate, the Gozo ferry does not operate and even sometimes the Helicopter did not operate - what you, in Gozo need, is something that bad weather does not hinder its operations! is there a solution?

Roy Perry

I would prefer comments to be constructive and not personal. I have lived in Gozo since 1990 and have no home elsewhere. I have always tried to improve the standard of life and information in my adopted country and have generally been treated with respect.
Gozo will not benefit from a bridge which will cost hundreds of millions of Euros. The airlink proposals CANNOT be extended to include larger aircraft.
A. Because there is no need.
B. Because the Tarmac (not concrete) strip will not bear their weight.

So far as damage to the heritage and archaeology in concerned, I know exactly where every Cart Rut, Temple fragment, Bore Hole, Sewerage Outfall, etc. is located on the site. An airfield is a protected area where flora can thrive. If the development also looks after these heritage issues it is surely better than letting them be un-recognised or fall into decay - like the 16th Century St. Cecilia Chapel which is falling down for want of attention.

I have nothing to gain financially from the project - now isn't that foolish!

Raymond Sammut

An airstrip in Gozo would create an indelible mark on the tiny picturesque sister island. If presently there is some kind of a dump there, then the dump should be cleared, and the area tidied up. We are not to fix a wrong with something which is clearly incongruous. Now imagine living on a tiny island with small propeller aircrafts hovering over your roof. They are always looking for this damnable airstrip so they can land. It would make me feel nervous. These things are notorious for falling off the sky. All it takes is some pilot error, or something going loose in the mechanics. Once it happens, it happens. An entire family is gone. Now, that so much has been "invested", the airstrip will not go away. There will be an investigation to find out what caused the tragedy, but the show must go on -- Gozitans will simply have to get used to it. You're kidding me. I also have to disagree with you, L Galea. There are now 250,000 cars registered. Once you build a bridge, these cars will incessantly be heading Gozo's way. Gozo too will be infected with pollution as Malta is now.

Barry Drake

Having been involved in the traveling side of things since1986 and now residing for the past eight years there is something that puzzles me. Why, after building an acceptable sized heliport that coped quite well, is there never any talk about having a helicopter service again rather than a fixed wing service? Everyone says it not financially viable, but I`m sure that there must be some one with the same business acumen as Sir Richard Branson and who could see the benefits that such a service would bring to the island. I for one think it has been the best system used during my many visits since 1986

ouch when the saints
ouch when the saints
ouch when the saints go marching in...

Mind you, the word 'saints' in the local context has a very political meaning.
It's like when one says that "a saint in need is a saint indeed".
Ouch ouch

Is an air link a real necessity?

People like Franco J. Scicluna would say yes.

One of the reasons (?) Mr. Scicluna gives is that "If only a serious air service was in operation between Gozo and Malta International Airport a lot of hassle and hardship would have been avoided during the (bus) strike."
In his letter to The Times on Friday 25th July 2008 he wrote about a serious inter-island air service.

Once again, his letter provoked other people to add their comments on The Times on-line.

Here they are:

apgrech

What's wrong with extending Gozo's runway a bit and put two or three smaller aircrafts to service between Malta and Gozo? If prices are reasonable, the service will be used by many.

John Portelli
Gozo needs a viable airlink. Period. It's ridiculous that in this day and age, there is no airlink. We have gone back so much in time, it's not even funny. Is this what we call progress. Or is this a big joke.

Liam Kelly

So we're trying to justify using air transport to take us the gigantic distance of a few miles?

The spannish company stopped operating for a reason; no market.

Isn't it obvious what Roy Perry will want given is well known agenda?

The truth is it is unrealistic, unnecessary, irresponsible and down right damaging to have any form of air link to Gozo, deep down we all know that.

Hovercraft is the answer.

N Palmer

@Liam Kelly

I think you will find that Helisureste stopped operations because the cost associated with operating a helicopter in terms of maintenance and fuel far outweighed the price that people were willing to pay for the ticket.

It's not that there is no market for an air-link to Gozo but rather than it needs to be a cost effective solution, and helicopters are not the answer! This means that an air-link can only be served by a suitable fixed wing aircraft, and then one goes back to the various ongoing issues that have been discussed over the past couple of years.

Vincent Gauci

Before jumping to hasty conclusions about the need for increasing the length of the air strip in Gozo, we should see how this would feature within the concept of Gozo as an eco-island.

John Mizzi

If the heliport is not going to be used it should be decommissioned and all the buried cart ruts underneath uncovered. The Roman vine canals should be cleared as well and the whole area turned into a tourism archaeological park. The heritage superintendence should schedule the whole area ASAP. At Ta' Lambert Gozitans go to worship the Virgin Mary since they realize that the whole area is a special place.

L Galea

A Gozo aircraft link with the necessary extension to the runway is simply a continuation of the rape of Gozo. A bridge is an all-weather means of linking the Islands.

I agree with John Mizzi that the Roman vine canals be uncovered as they would serve as a tourist attraction.

How on earth can you boast of an eco-island when you want to continue to rape it to satisfy your greed and comfort?

Liam Kelly

@ N Palmer

So your saying when Helsureste did their feasibility research in the first place they thought...there's a market....so it must work....Operating costs... what are those?

Perhaps not.

Roy S. Perry

I wish to thank Franco for keeping the subject in view. The problem here is that nobody listens to exactly what is being proposed nor do they appreciate the need. There is a perfectly good ferry service for commuters in both directions. There is NOT a quick, comfortable and reliable fast link for our visitors, the elderly or infirm, those without patience or medical staff.

Go to the GozoAirlink blog and note that 85% of voters support it. Ask most Gozitans and they agree. Most of all, why don't we stop this 'pussyfooting about' and set up a meeting to exchange ideas instead of this perpetual slanging match.

An Airlink will bring discerning visitors, a bridge would ONLY be valid between communities of similar size. Most of all, I say, let Gozo decide.

By the way, I have designed and costed the idea of a bridge (actually two would be needed - via Comino - and a submersible tunnel. Both options are incredibly expensive and impractical. This, after all, is not Manhatten!

James A. Tyrrell

First of all I would like to say that I support what John Mizzi says 100%. I also agree with most of what Liam Kelly says although I don't think a hovercraft is the answer. Nor is a bridge as suggested by L Galea. The problem with a bridge apart from the obvious one of cost is that it provides easy access for criminals.

As for Roy S. Perry and his desire to concrete over more of the little island of Gozo I would be interested in knowing if he personally has a vested interest in any such development.

The only answer and the least disruptive one given the short distance involved and the small size of the island is a restoration of the helicopter service. If the Government were serious about Gozo as an Eco island then surely they would be more than willing to subsidise such a service to protect the Gozo environment.

Adrian Cardona

"The problem with a bridge apart from the obvious one of cost is that it provides easy access for criminals"
What kind of reason is that??!! Are you worried that poor crime-free Gozo will be raped and pillaged by the nefarious Maltese?

apgrech

I had a second thought. To go to Gozo by ferry say from Lija, one would have to drive to Cirkewwa. If same person have to fly to Gozo, s/he has to drive to Luqa so, it's Cikku briku plus, one can't go by car if s/he uses the aircraft.

It is amazing what reasons people who say they arte in favour of an airstrip on this little island comes up with. As if the buses strike which occured in malta mid this month are going to take place on a monthly basis! As if the sea between Malta and Gozo is going to be so rough that the 20-minute ferry will stop working!

On the otherhand it seems that for a 20 minute ferry journey, some are ready to put more tarmac and cement the whole idea once and for all.

What Gozo really needs

The Times of Malta today published a letter by the Secretary of the Gozo Tourism Association (GTA).

Basically the GTA referred to Franco Scicluna's previous letter to the Times entitles 'Serious Inter-island Air Service'.

The GTA reiterated that "since its inception in February 1999, our stand regarding the air link between Malta and Gozo has always been in favour of an air strip"

The GTA states that "The association and its members are living the experience of the absence of an air strip and are fully aware what tourism on Gozo is losing through this lack of alternative service".

A quite strong and much debatable statement by the GTA is this one: "The future of the tourism industry on Gozo relies on the availability of an air strip" and in order to tone this done, the secretary of the GTA added "...well situated and blending with the Gozitan countryside".

The GTA statement concluded by encouraging the government to "to take the bold decision in favour of an air strip and surely in favour of Gozo."

BOLD indeed. Is this what the GTA will be proposing for the eco-gozo project? Hope not!

Interesting are some of the comments published on The Times on-line.

Here they are:

emanuel bajada

The GTA Secretary would better tackle the issue of the construction works ongoing in Xlendi and Marsalforn destroying the holiday of hundreds of holidaymakers in both resorts. What is the use of wooing holiday makers to the island offering first class air link service to find construction rogues waking them at 6 in the morning with all type of excavation, shattering noise from construction machinery and shouting.

If Mr Muscat wants his association to be credible he should explain why Xlendi and Marsalforn had since last year lost the status of a touristic area for construction purposes bar 5 streets in each location. He should tell us what the association has done to have competent authority reinstate this status for this 2 important tourist resorts. Glad to know this have been corrected since the 7th instant for which I would like to thank Mr. David Apap area manager MTA and also Parliamentary Sec. Hon Chris Said for their efforts for having the relevant authority correcting this anomaly. Now it is up to competent enforcement authorities to see that this new legislation is adhered too. Our visitor's holiday is destroyed by construction works not because there is no air link !!!!

M. galea
We have the GTA reacting again where it suits the books of some of its businessman-members.
"The future of the tourism industry on Gozo relies on the availability of an air strip"
Oh come on....

Instigate a general cleanup of the island.

Look at the illegal dumping sites over archeological remains at Ta' Lambert - Xewkija so near the heliport.

Look at the welcoming concrete monster at Dwejra.

Look at the attitude of some bars, shops and restaurant owners ready to rip off tourists (yes they need to make a living)

Look at the nonexistent public transport system on the island!

Look at the behavior of taxi drivers down at the harbor as soon as they spot a tourist coming down from the ferry.

Look at the shabbiness around the Gozo countryside including the filt around the hiostoric salt pants.

If the GTA is not pro-active in such basic areas, how could they be trusted in overlooking the building of an airstrip?

I wonder sometimes why neither the GTA or the Business Chamber never applaud AD's proposal of sea-links (catamaran, sea-planes) directly from Gozo to other parts of the Mediterranean.

Perhaps they are afraid that Giovanna will fire them?

Roy Perry

I wish to thank Mr Muscat for supporting the idea of an airstrip in Gozo. There seems little point if the major hotels in Gozo improve their standard of accommodation and facilities if the discerning visitor is excluded from a fast and convenient transfer by air. I invite Joe to contact me on 27016277 to attend a meeting on Saturday morning - August 2nd. See also http://gozoairstrip.blogspot.com

Liam Kelly

You must be deluded if you think that building a airstrip constitutes a 'balanced' development on a tiny island!

However, since you've also said that the future of your tourism industry relies on an airstrip, you won't be needing the ferry service anymore then will you? We'll just take that away in order to pay for your air strip....then you'll realise what a ridiculous statement that was I'm sure.

Its particularly worrying that since you work in the tourism industry yourself, you have yet to figure out the rationale of tourists coming to Gozo....peace and quiet, tranquility, greenery and to get away from life....How does an airstrip fit into that raison d'etre?

That IS your market because it is what makes Gozo so NATURALLY beautiful, any destination can copy another destination, but the price of this is that it takes away what made it attractive in the first place.

Franco Farrugia

Go on, Gozitans! Destroy the tiny island, the only environmentally-sound area we have in the Maltese islands.

An air strip will destroy Gozo as we know it now. Think of the land that it will necessary eat up; think about the noise of the aircraft, that same that we hear in the Gudja/Luqa areas. Think of the building amenities which will have to mushroom!!!

Perhaps Mr Muscat can elucidate on what 'other opportunities the island needs to enhance its primary tourism industry'.

I think the Government should be committed to the sparing of Gozo of the same downward development that has destroyed the mainland!

I don't personally believe that 'the future of the tourism industry on Gozo relies on the availability of an airs strip.'

How can Mr Muscat speak about an air strip which is 'well situated' and 'blending with the Gozitan countryside'? We are speaking about two opposite things - airstrip and countryside. God and the Devil. Right, and wrong. Black and White. Plus and minus.

Kapixx?

Alfred Grech

I'm in full agreement with Joe Muscat. It's about time the government considers Gozo as an excellent destination for Maltese and tourists alike. It's a gem that needs to be promoted and made easy to access.

Gozo is unique and beautiful and its people are warm, friendly and accomodating.

Accomodating indeed, especially if Gozitans fall for this trap by a few businessmen!

Objective of this blog

Some people argue that an airstrip in Gozo is needed; others say no.

The lobby is still alive and kicking in the year 2008.

One of the main arguments in favor of an airstrip in Gozo is that "The future of the tourism industry on Gozo relies on the availability of an air strip" - the Gozo Tourism Association secretary Joe Muscat (Times of Malta 29th July 2008).

Many others however say that the future of the tourism industry in Gozo depends on many other things. Some of these are so basic and much less expensive than an airstrip.

The aim of this blog is to give an opportunity for all, to discuss and debate whether Gozo - a 67 km² in size island - needs an airstrip or not.

Feel free to add your views and comments by click on the comment icon with each blog entry.

Cheers,

Ghawdxi flyer.