Roy S. Perry, a blind ex-pat residing in Qala, expressed frustration saying that "Gozitan organisations have not exerted enough pressure on the government to improve tourist numbers on the island."
Frank Salt, obviously a supporter of the idea, noted that "It takes a blind man to put forward sensible ideas that will halt the decline in commerce and tourism."
The meeting was concluded with a resolve to form a working party of businessmen who will be approaching the government.
Ouch ouch....the businessmen are coming in.... Once again, several Times readers added their comments on the Times on-line, including those by Roy Perry himself and his wife Josie Perry. Then we have people like the Irish James A. Tyrrell - a regular contributor for the gozonews.com
The comments follow here:
E Camilleri
Finally we have a fixed wing sea plane between malta-gozo, why the insistence to continue destroying the last few open spaces? Having an airstrip to increase gozo tourism is false. Leave Gozo in its remaining natural state and then only you can boost tourism or at least keep the numbers.
Maria Dolores Fenech
So Gozo would have a heliport which is no longer functional due to high fees, but an airstrip to accomodate a few businessmen! Would the Gozitans allow this to happen in their (still) unspoilt beautiful island?
L Galea
These very negative people who oppose rapid air commuting most likely have a good eye sight but prefer not to see! Airplanes are not silly, they are man's best invention which greatly enhances anybody's life in more ways then one, it seems these people have no idea & are installing a false picture! Maybe they prefer the site in question to continue be used as a dump site & a derelict heliport! Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association USA A valued member since 1993 # 01161606
Eugenio Taliana
During bad weather the seaplane does not operate, the Gozo ferry does not operate and even sometimes the Helicopter did not operate - what you, in Gozo need, is something that bad weather does not hinder its operations! is there a solution?
Roy Perry
Gozo will not benefit from a bridge which will cost hundreds of millions of Euros. The airlink proposals CANNOT be extended to include larger aircraft.
A. Because there is no need.
B. Because the Tarmac (not concrete) strip will not bear their weight.
So far as damage to the heritage and archaeology in concerned, I know exactly where every Cart Rut, Temple fragment, Bore Hole, Sewerage Outfall, etc. is located on the site. An airfield is a protected area where flora can thrive. If the development also looks after these heritage issues it is surely better than letting them be un-recognised or fall into decay - like the 16th Century St. Cecilia Chapel which is falling down for want of attention.
I have nothing to gain financially from the project - now isn't that foolish!
Barry Drake
As I have already suggested what is needed is a bridge to solve the Shipyard problems, the installation of wind generators on the bridge itself to allievate the energy problem, and the provision of a continuous means of transport between Malta and Gozo solving the problem for Maltese and Gozitans and tourists, especially in an emergency.
Why do businessmen see nothing except their own narrow private interests instead of the common interest of the Maltese and Gozitan people?
Why are they so intent on continuing to destroy more land in both Malta and Gozo?